Conventional thinking is that policy supports the advancement of clean energy gradually and progressively, with hard-won gains setting up further success over time. And sometimes, it does play out this way. But sometimes it doesn\u2019t, too. Our guest in this episode, Dr. Leah Stokes of UC Santa Barbara, describes the policymaking around energy transition as a matter of \u201corganized combat\u201d between clean energy advocates and incumbents in the utility and fossil fuel sectors \u2014 a process of combat which produces winners and losers. And rather than be shy about that, she argues, advocates for climate action and energy transition need to learn from their opponents and get much more organized and serious about winning policy battles.<\/p>\n
In this two-hour interview, we talk through the history of clean energy policymaking, and how it was rolled back or thwarted, in four U.S. states. Step by step and case by case, we can learn from her original research what the winning tactics are, and how to lock in victories when we win them. This episode is critical listening for anyone involved in policymaking, regulatory interventions, crafting legislation, or activism.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
What are the winning (and losing) tactics in crafting policy to support energy transition, and what do advocates need to do to win? <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[111],"tags":[456,902,240,261,660,901,903,256,223,24,399,26,543,64,900,174,45],"class_list":["post-2735","xen_episodes","type-xen_episodes","status-publish","hentry","category-energy-transition-show-podcasts","tag-advocacy","tag-alec","tag-arizona","tag-gas","tag-geopolitics","tag-kansas","tag-koch","tag-ohio","tag-oil","tag-policy","tag-politics","tag-renewables","tag-rps","tag-solar","tag-texas","tag-utilities","tag-wind","xen_guests-leah-stokes"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n